Ed Cook, BSs; Aly Curd, MEmergMgt
Land Search and Rescue New Zealand
Email terrainbasedprobability@gmail.com
https://doi.org/10.61618/ZLHL6375
Abstract
This study presents an empirical qualitative thematic analysis of SAR practitioner responses collected during a structured workshop-based assessment at the New Zealand Land Search and Rescue Hui (Conference) in Tamaki Makaurau, Auckland. The workshop aimed at exploring Search and Rescue (SAR) personnel’s understanding of key SAR planning concepts. A structured 15-minute quiz was administered to 70 participants, divided into 16 groups, to assess their knowledge of terminology and operational concepts related to search theory. The analysis revealed a general consensus on fundamental terms such as “Search,” “Rescue,” and “Recovery,” with minor variations in the interpretation of terms like “Lost” versus “Missing” and the relationship between Initial Planning Points (IPP), Place Last Seen (PLS) and Last Known Points (LKP). Additionally, the study highlighted SAR personnel’s preferences for specific search strategies and operational decision-making, such as prioritising localised search efforts over broader expansions. The findings highlight the importance of standardising terminology, improving conceptual Search Theory understanding and refining training approaches to enhance consistency and efficiency in SAR operations. Recommendations include developing a shared lexicon, scenario-based training, and ongoing stakeholder engagement to improve the application of research insights in operational settings. This analysis contributes to the refinement of SAR training and operational strategies, aiming to increase the effectiveness and adaptability of SAR teams in Aotearoa New Zealand.
KEY WORDS: Search and Rescue, Terrain-based Probability, Human Factor, Decision-making, Thematic Analysis.